I agree, there is no tolerance for fascism, but actually religions are built on murder and violence. So, I can’t even take seriously those "some precepts of violence". Religion is a fucking form of fascism, that’s why they always supported fascism — catolics, orthodoxes, muslims (I am sure about Iran, for example), because religion is the same form of oppression as fascism is. So, fix your fucking "percepts of violence" too. So, to be muslim is not the same to be "Jew". Jew can become muslim. Muslim can’t become Jew, he can become Judaist. Jew — is a man, muslim, catolic,socialist, fascist — is a mam with certain ideology — good or bad, but it can be changed. So, I can understand why fascists can hate socialists, and why muslims can hate gays. They hate people with certain way of thinking. And here is a danger rethoric — any time you will put in the row — nationality and systems of belief, fascists will dare to compare themselves with it all, and require the right to hate. Like orthodoxes (Bible says them to hate the certain part of the population). Like catolics (Bible says them to hate the certain part of the population). Like muslims (Koran says them to hate the certain part of the population). That’s why they will dare to ask their same rights.
We, in my fascistic New Russia, have orthodox invasion — this is the same fascism, guys. Chechen people are under pressure of violence muslim oppression — women suffer, disagreed people die. Fascism has much more forms besides grab pussies and insurance, guys.
I don’t care about religions, but you know, guys, religion is the system, which always fucking cares about you and your way of living.
Okay, you know what? Leaving aside First Amendment issues and just speaking in general terms…
How dare you? How DARE you ask us how we would feel if we substituted "Muslim" or "Jew" or "Socialist" or whatever other example you want to provide for "Nazi" when we’re arguing over how to respond? Over how we react to Spencer getting punched?
How. Fucking. Dare. You.
Nazism isn’t a religion. It isn’t just another political view that happens to be unpopular in some circles. It is a movement BUILT ON MURDER AND VIOLENCE. Not "has some precepts of violence in it" as most religions have, not "devolved to it in the past" as many political movements have. This is what it IS. This is what it’s for. It’s about taking the power, and then the lives, of marginalized people, and it’s PROUD OF IT.
You want to argue about how best to deal with them, fine. I’ve had discussions and arguments over how best to oppose them, over whether or not they’re engaging in protected speech, with people who are still friends.
But you start trying to tell me that they should be treated exactly, and with the same respect, as any other group? You start comparing other religions or mainstream political movements to them? All you’ve proven to me is that you are hideously ignorant at best, an active threat at worst, and either way you are doing their work for them, and you are not to be trusted.
You SURE as hell have proved you have no argument worth listening to, and you’re no friend of mine.